comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: inconsistence in 5.4 -> 6.0

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: inconsistence in 5.4 -> 6.0

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: inconsistence in 5.4 -> 6.0 [message #36592 is a reply to message #36591]

Tue, 07 October 2003 10:19

GrahamWilsonCA
Messages: 12
Registered: January 2003

Junior Member

Marc Schellens <m_schellens@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<3F827F34.9010207@hotmail.com>...
>
> in 5.4:
>
> IDL> cc=complex(0,1)
> IDL> if cc then print,'true' else print,'false'
> false
>
> in 6.0:
>
> IDL> cc=complex(0,1)
> IDL> if cc then print,'true' else print,'false'
> true
>
> potentially dangerous, isn't it?

Seriously, you don't use IDL for complex numbers do you?

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: inconsistence in 5.4 -> 6.0 By: marc schellens[1] on Wed, 08 October 2003 02:16
		Re: inconsistence in 5.4 -> 6.0 By: marc schellens[1] on Wed, 08 October 2003 02:04
		Re: inconsistence in 5.4 -> 6.0 By: David Fanning on Tue, 07 October 2003 10:50
		Re: inconsistence in 5.4 -> 6.0 By: GrahamWilsonCA on Tue, 07 October 2003 10:19
		Re: inconsistence in 5.4 -> 6.0 By: Craig Markwardt on Thu, 09 October 2003 15:12
		Re: inconsistence in 5.4 -> 6.0 By: David Fanning on Thu, 09 October 2003 05:18

Previous Topic:	Re: javascript variable in ionscript
Next Topic:	Re: UNIQ and structure arrays

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 15:28:17 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.67495 seconds