comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: inconsistence in 5.4 -> 6.0

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: inconsistence in 5.4 -> 6.0

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: inconsistence in 5.4 -> 6.0 [message #36646 is a reply to message #36570]

Thu, 09 October 2003 15:12

Craig Markwardt
Messages: 1869
Registered: November 1996

Senior Member

Marc Schellens <m_schellens@hotmail.com> writes:
>> Seriously, you don't use IDL for complex numbers do you?
>
> No.
> I was just playing with 6.0
>
> But why are you so sure about this?
> I always thought that other people well use complex numbers.
> Are there some reasons why nobody should use IDL with complex numbers?
> Anybody out there using complex numbers in IDL?

I use them all the time, in Fourier-type applications (including FFT).
I've never had a problem.

Craig

--
------------------------------------------------------------ --------------
Craig B. Markwardt, Ph.D. EMAIL: craigmnet@REMOVEcow.physics.wisc.edu
Astrophysics, IDL, Finance, Derivatives | Remove "net" for better response
------------------------------------------------------------ --------------

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: inconsistence in 5.4 -> 6.0 By: marc schellens[1] on Wed, 08 October 2003 02:16
		Re: inconsistence in 5.4 -> 6.0 By: marc schellens[1] on Wed, 08 October 2003 02:04
		Re: inconsistence in 5.4 -> 6.0 By: David Fanning on Tue, 07 October 2003 10:50
		Re: inconsistence in 5.4 -> 6.0 By: GrahamWilsonCA on Tue, 07 October 2003 10:19
		Re: inconsistence in 5.4 -> 6.0 By: Craig Markwardt on Thu, 09 October 2003 15:12
		Re: inconsistence in 5.4 -> 6.0 By: David Fanning on Thu, 09 October 2003 05:18

Previous Topic:	Re: javascript variable in ionscript
Next Topic:	Re: UNIQ and structure arrays

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 04:53:32 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.44484 seconds