comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Porting to VM
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Porting to VM [message #37305 is a reply to message #37301] Wed, 10 December 2003 19:19 Go to previous message
David Fanning is currently offline  David Fanning
Messages: 11724
Registered: August 2001
Senior Member
JD Smith writes:

> I've been trying to get a large application working in the new IDLVM, and
> have run into trouble: apparently, in all calls like:
>
> XManager, /NO_BLOCK
>
> the NO_BLOCK is ignored, and the call blocks anyway. I suppose this makes
> sense, since IDL's non-blocking functionality is provided by the
> command-line, which isn't there in the VM. Why would you care about
> blocking if there's no command line to interact with? For my purposes,
> the distinction between blocking and non-blocking is whether calls which
> invoke XManager return immediately, or wait until the managed widget
> dies. This isn't mentioned in the "Restrictions" on the VM FAQ page.
> Anyone managed to deal with this issue?

In SAVE files I've made recently, I've had to add
JUST_REG keywords to all the XMANAGER calls before the
last one, which will block and get everything else
going.

Cheers,

David

--
David W. Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
Phone: 970-221-0438, E-mail: david@dfanning.com
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
Toll-Free IDL Book Orders: 1-888-461-0155
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Virtual machine errors: badmatch, badwindow, object graphics
Next Topic: Re: Mesh decimate for DXF data formats

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Dec 03 17:22:36 PST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 2.56428 seconds