comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: For loops vs. matrix operations

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: For loops vs. matrix operations

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: For loops vs. matrix operations [message #37427]

Thu, 18 December 2003 04:55

David Fanning
Messages: 11724
Registered: August 2001

Senior Member

Alex Schuster writes:

> Matricyzation should always save time, especially if you have small
> inner loops. I also think this makes the code more readable and
> universal.

Indeed. Witness any of JD's one line wonders. *Very simple* to read.

Cheers,

David

P.S. Let's just say *understanding* is a bit slower in coming
for me. :-)

--
David W. Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http:/www.dfanning.com/
Phone: 970-221-0438, IDL Book Orders: 1-888-461-0155

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: For loops vs. matrix operations By: David Fanning on Thu, 18 December 2003 04:55
		Re: For loops vs. matrix operations By: marc schellens[1] on Wed, 17 December 2003 23:25
		Re: For loops vs. matrix operations By: Kenneth P. Bowman on Wed, 17 December 2003 18:59
		Re: For loops vs. matrix operations By: JD Smith on Wed, 17 December 2003 17:31
		Re: For loops vs. matrix operations By: James Kuyper on Wed, 17 December 2003 15:52
		Re: For loops vs. matrix operations By: Wonko[3] on Wed, 17 December 2003 15:24
		Re: For loops vs. matrix operations By: Craig Markwardt on Wed, 17 December 2003 14:57
		Re: For loops vs. matrix operations By: mperrin+news on Wed, 17 December 2003 15:05

Previous Topic:	always widget!
Next Topic:	Re: How to make IDL be quiet

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 15:28:12 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00407 seconds