comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » IDL vs Direct3D, OpenGL

Home » Public Forums » archive » IDL vs Direct3D, OpenGL

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: IDL vs Direct3D, OpenGL [message #37705 is a reply to message #37646]

Thu, 15 January 2004 10:28

David Fanning
Messages: 11724
Registered: August 2001

Senior Member

Michael Wallace writes:

> I don't mean to take things off-subject here, but does RSI have any
> plans to make a decent IDLDE for Linux/Unix? Or will they always leave
> it in that half-backed, unusable and ugly state? Anyway, there are many
> reasons while my primary development consists of gvim and command-line IDL.

Why would RSI want to invest time and money in this when
they have JD doing it for them for free (apparently)?
Believe me, I have never seen *anyone* at RSI on a UNIX
machine use anything except IDLWAVE to write IDL code.

Cheers,

David

--
David W. Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
Phone: 970-221-0438, E-mail: david@dfanning.com
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
Toll-Free IDL Book Orders: 1-888-461-0155

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		IDL vs Direct3D, OpenGL By: bbhyun2001 on Tue, 13 January 2004 10:44
		Re: IDL vs Direct3D, OpenGL By: David Fanning on Fri, 16 January 2004 15:19
		Re: IDL vs Direct3D, OpenGL By: rkneusel on Fri, 16 January 2004 15:05
		Re: IDL vs Direct3D, OpenGL By: David Fanning on Thu, 15 January 2004 20:12
		Re: IDL vs Direct3D, OpenGL By: David Fanning on Thu, 15 January 2004 10:28

Previous Topic:	Re: IDL Programmer Seeking Sabbatical Position
Next Topic:	Re: polyfillv and the boundary pixels

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sun Oct 12 02:34:38 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.72368 seconds