comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » ROUTINE

Home » Public Forums » archive » ROUTINE_NAMES

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: ROUTINE_NAMES [message #3781 is a reply to message #3665]

Fri, 10 March 1995 08:42

thompson
Messages: 584
Registered: August 1991

Senior Member

Earlier, I wrote:

> We're using an undocumented routine called ROUTINE_NAMES to retrieve the names
> of IDL routines. For example,

> f_name = ROUTINE_NAMES(/s_functions)
> p_name = ROUTINE_NAMES(/s_procedures)
> internal = [f_name, p_name]

> We use this to assist the user in determining whether or not a routine is
> internal or not, and whether or not a proposed routine name will conflict with
> anything already defined, either internal or in the path.

> Does anybody else use this feature, or think that it is useful? If the
> consensus is that this is a good thing, I would like to ask RSI to upgrade this
> to be documented, so that we know it will not go away in a future release.

> I've been told that this feature is also available in PV-Wave.

I've gotten email from several people saying that they thought that this
feature was useful. I find it gratifying, but point out that RSI won't see
your opinion if you don't also post it or send them a copy.

Bill Thompson

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		ROUTINE_NAMES By: thompson on Tue, 07 March 1995 15:29
		Re: ROUTINE_NAMES By: thompson on Fri, 10 March 1995 08:42

Previous Topic:	reading double precision
Next Topic:	Bug in PV Wave plot_oo?

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sun Oct 12 12:15:11 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.59820 seconds