comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Announcing GDL 0.7, now with PLOT command
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Announcing GDL 0.7, now with PLOT command [message #38532 is a reply to message #38309] Wed, 17 March 2004 01:37 Go to previous message
hcp is currently offline  hcp
Messages: 41
Registered: August 1995
Member
In article <Pine.LNX.4.58.0403141421410.1704@cerberus.cwmannwn.nowhere>, "George N. White III" <aa056@chebucto.ns.ca> writes:
[highly perceptive analysis snipped]

|> I started using R for statistical summaries and reports because it has
|> excellent support for dealing with missing values as well as the
|> statistical tools. Recently I've been doing more things in R because they
|> can be used by more people than if they are done in IDL, but GDL could
|> reverse that trend.

Too right. It's a case of "Here's my code: you'll need to install this
free package to use it" versus "Here's my code: You'll need to cough up
�1000 to RSI to use it". (IDL 6 addresses this to some extent with the VM,
but that doesn't help if you want the person you are giving your code to to
do anything with it apart from run it.)

Hugh

--
============S=u=p=p=o=r=t===D=e=b=i=a=n===http://www.debian. org==========
Dr. Hugh C. Pumphrey, School of GeoSciences
The University of Edinburgh, EDINBURGH EH9 3JZ, Scotland
OBDisclaimer: The views expressed herein are mine, not those of UofE.
============================================================ =============
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: Reentrant API/IDL_KW_OFFSETOF() issue
Next Topic: Re: how do I delete ENVI windows from a procedure?

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 14:56:00 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00438 seconds