comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: CDF vs HDF

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: CDF vs HDF [message #38854 is a reply to message #38853]

Wed, 31 March 2004 06:30

mmiller3
Messages: 81
Registered: January 2002

Member

>>>> > "Kenneth" == Kenneth Bowman <k-bowman@null.tamu.edu> writes:

> In article <87ptaum3hk.fsf@lumen.indyrad.iupui.edu>,
> mmiller3@iupui.edu (Michael A. Miller) wrote:

>> NetCDF cannot handle files larger than 2 Gbytes due to an
>> internal 32 bit integer.

> This is not strictly true.

> From the UNIDATA netCDF FAQ:
[...]

Thanks for pointing that out, Ken!

Mike

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: CDF vs HDF By: giglio on Thu, 01 April 2004 10:58
		Re: CDF vs HDF By: david.b.han on Thu, 01 April 2004 05:10
		Re: CDF vs HDF By: david.b.han on Thu, 01 April 2004 04:56
		Re: CDF vs HDF By: K. Bowman on Wed, 31 March 2004 08:20
		Re: CDF vs HDF By: mmiller3 on Wed, 31 March 2004 06:30
		Re: CDF vs HDF By: K. Bowman on Tue, 30 March 2004 14:53
		Re: CDF vs HDF By: mmiller3 on Tue, 30 March 2004 13:25
		Re: CDF vs HDF By: Paul Van Delst[1] on Tue, 30 March 2004 13:03

Previous Topic:	Re: again call_external
Next Topic:	CDF vs HDF

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 22:44:00 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.40011 seconds