comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Keyword abbreviation ambiguities
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Keyword abbreviation ambiguities [message #38931 is a reply to message #38930] Sun, 04 April 2004 08:07 Go to previous message
Craig Markwardt is currently offline  Craig Markwardt
Messages: 1869
Registered: November 1996
Senior Member
justspam03@yahoo.de (Oliver Thilmann) writes:
>> function testfunc, title=t, title1=t1
...
> I don't see any ambiguity here. May I consider this a
> (design-)bug, or is there some deeper meaning to this behaviour?

You may consider it a design bug -- I do -- but RSI does not. The
ambiguity is that TITLE "could be" a shortened version of TITLE1.
This has been discussed on the newsgroup, and most people agreed that
the desired behavior is that if there is an exact keyword match, there
should be no ambiguity error. Unfortunately, with the way that IDL
presently works, there is no way for you to get your program working
with those two keywords.

Craig

--
------------------------------------------------------------ --------------
Craig B. Markwardt, Ph.D. EMAIL: craigmnet@REMOVEcow.physics.wisc.edu
Astrophysics, IDL, Finance, Derivatives | Remove "net" for better response
------------------------------------------------------------ --------------
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Print, 34000/340000 results 0? what ́s wrong?
Next Topic: Re: Print, 34000/340000 results 0? what ́s wrong?

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sun Oct 12 17:18:21 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.96267 seconds