comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: Read & write data files b/w IDL & Fortran 90

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Read & write data files b/w IDL & Fortran 90

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Read & write data files b/w IDL & Fortran 90 [message #39061 is a reply to message #39060]

Thu, 08 April 2004 15:00

wmconnolley
Messages: 106
Registered: November 2000

Senior Member

bridgemat <bridgemat@yahoo.com> wrote:
> test=indgen(3,4,5)
> openw,lun,'testidl.dat',/get_lun
> writeu,lun,test
> free_lun,lun

Isn't there a /f77 keyword? Fortran is a bit weird: it adds the record
length at the start (and end) of each record; IDL needs to know you
want to write a fortran-style file.

-W.

--
William M Connolley | wmc@bas.ac.uk | http://www.antarctica.ac.uk/met/wmc/
Climate Modeller, British Antarctic Survey | Disclaimer: I speak for myself
I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file & help me spread!

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: Read & write data files b/w IDL & Fortran 90 By: Paul Van Delst[1] on Wed, 14 April 2004 13:56
		Re: Read & write data files b/w IDL & Fortran 90 By: bridgemat on Wed, 14 April 2004 13:45
		Re: Read & write data files b/w IDL & Fortran 90 By: Paul Van Delst[1] on Fri, 09 April 2004 13:44
		Re: Read & write data files b/w IDL & Fortran 90 By: Paul Van Delst[1] on Fri, 09 April 2004 13:37
		Re: Read & write data files b/w IDL & Fortran 90 By: bridgemat on Fri, 09 April 2004 13:20
		Re: Read & write data files b/w IDL & Fortran 90 By: bridgemat on Fri, 09 April 2004 12:35
		Re: Read & write data files b/w IDL & Fortran 90 By: Paul Van Delst[1] on Thu, 08 April 2004 14:45
		Re: Read & write data files b/w IDL & Fortran 90 By: wmconnolley on Thu, 08 April 2004 15:00

Previous Topic:	Re: How to rebin complex array?
Next Topic:	processor for idl on MoinMoin

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Thu Oct 09 21:57:34 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.91873 seconds