comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Is there any conventions style programming IDL?
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Is there any conventions style programming IDL? [message #39095 is a reply to message #39093] Thu, 22 April 2004 20:48 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Michael Wallace is currently offline  Michael Wallace
Messages: 409
Registered: December 2003
Senior Member
> Mike Schienle has this available on the web:
> http://www.customvisuals.com/IDL_Style.html

This document combined with a couple of tips from David make a good set
of rules to follow. There are a couple things I think I'll adopt into
my personal style. However, I have to disagree with the use of
Hungarian notation. IDL is a weakly-typed, dynamic language and
enforcing Hungarian rules removes some of the benefits of such a
language. I don't have the time now to get into the details, but I see
it as more of a hindrance rather than a help.

Hungarian notation is not suited to weakly-typed dynamic languages such
as IDL, Python or Perl or object-oriented languages such as Java or C++.
Hungarian notation does have it's place in the strongly-typed
procedural languages like good ol' C. I actually use Hungarian notation
a lot when doing C -- it makes casting and variable type mistakes so
much easier to catch.

-Mike
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: Check marks on context sensitive menus
Next Topic: WHERE Command Bug with Floating underflow

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sat Oct 11 00:12:22 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.88334 seconds