comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Choice of 64-bit platform for IDL
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Choice of 64-bit platform for IDL [message #39547 is a reply to message #39483] Tue, 25 May 2004 07:04 Go to previous message
Philip Kershaw is currently offline  Philip Kershaw
Messages: 5
Registered: March 2004
Junior Member
"Wolf Schweitzer" <shwi@irm.unizh.ch> wrote in message
news:40b1f080$1@zinews.unizh.ch...
> We are evaluating the purchase of a 64-bit platform for IDL.
>
>
> The Apple Powermac G5 does not support 8 GB of RAM for a single process
> so far and no one at Apple , and the performance of IDL under X11 is
> slower than on a simple IBM Thinkpad running the Windows IDL version, so
> we are getting ready to move. Of course, the G5 is very productive on
> all other fronts, and "we all hope" that in due time, the G5 will become
> the prime 64-bit-visualisation system in scientific computing.
>
> There's no 64-bit-Linux support because those developments are probably
> too recent, there's no 64-bit Windows so far, so we're left with a
> choice of Unix platforms.
>
> What we want to do is analyze, work with, and visualise, 3D-volume data
> that ranges around 900 MB to 2.5 GB.
>
> Which are your recommendations?
>
> - AIX: As I saw on older posts on this list, AIX was ready to be dropped
> from IDL customer support. What's the current situation? Is AIX having a
> large customer base @ RSINC, or are the numbers dwindling? Is IDL under
> AIX on current IBM systems, such as the Intellistation Power 275, very
> fast? The Power 275 seems to be rather fast according to the Spec2000
> (www.spec.org). Can someone confirm this, maybe include a time_test2
times?
>
> - SGI: Is IRIX still a main system supported by RSI, or are they getting
> ready to drop that, too? As far as I found, this board did not report
> too many negative experiences with SGI. On the other hand, these systems
> are very expensive.
>
> - Solaris: Are Sun Blade workstations a good choice? Is Solaris very
> common among IDL users?
>
> - HP/UX: What about the Itanium support? Itanium 2, maybe? No news by
> RSI yet, right?
>
>
>
> Thank you very much for any suggestions on how to choose a good 64-bit
> workstation for IDL,
>
> Wolf Schweitzer.

Not sure if this applies to your application but a customer has asked us to
deliver some s/w using IDL Data Miner for connectivity with a database.
This only runs as 32-bit! Not sure if this applies to any other IDL
add-ons?

We've used Solaris here on 64-bit architecture for a while. IDL seems more
robust than on Windows. I have encountered some problems though with some
of the widget functionality for X Windows. Most of these bugs seem to have
been ironed out for IDL 6.0.

We've just ordered a Sun Blade 1500 with 3GB memory. Price was very
reasonable.

Cheers,
Phil
____________________________________________

Philip Kershaw
Space Science & Technology Department
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
UK
____________________________________________
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Legend for IDL Plot
Next Topic: Re: Legend for IDL Plot

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Thu Oct 09 23:36:06 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.16103 seconds