comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Platform recommendation/tradeoffs?
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Platform recommendation/tradeoffs? [message #3957 is a reply to message #3953] Fri, 14 April 1995 00:00 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
daft is currently offline  daft
Messages: 5
Registered: February 1991
Junior Member
In article <bowman-1204952137380001@csrp12.tamu.edu> bowman@csrp.tamu.edu (Kenneth P. Bowman) writes:

Ken Bowman wrote (on comparative IDL performance):

Perhaps RSI has some comparison numbers?

Regards, Ken Bowman


I second the request for some comparison of IDL's performance on
various CPUs. I have been using IDL on Suns for a long time, but may
be required to switch to a Pentium machine for some period, and I'd
like to know what the performance differences would be.

I wonder if some kind of standard IDL test suite could be developed,
kinda like a SPECmark?

I think this might actually be of competitive advantage to RSI. A
colleague recently ported some IDL code [ultrasound transducer
simulations] to Matlab and found it to be *twice* as slow. . .

--
Chris M.W. Daft <daft@crd.ge.com>
KWC-1336, GE CR&D 518-387-6615
P.O. Box 8 518-387-7512 (fax)
Schenectady, N.Y. 12301-0008
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: partial derivatives of f(x,y)
Next Topic: Re: Student version of IDL

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 14:04:17 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.23614 seconds