comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: Bug in ISHFT? (NOT)

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Bug in ISHFT? (NOT)

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Bug in ISHFT? (NOT) [message #39657 is a reply to message #39652]

Sun, 30 May 2004 21:06

Craig Markwardt
Messages: 1869
Registered: November 1996

Senior Member

Craig Markwardt <craigmnet@REMOVEcow.physics.wisc.edu> writes:
> Would anybody call this a bug in IDL?
>
> IDL> print, ishft(6UL,40UL)
> 1536
> IDL> print, ishft(6UL,8UL)
> 1536
>
> ISHFT only seems to handle integers up to 32 bits, and then wraps
> around.

... or rather, I had a bug in my brain. Somehow I was mixing up
unsigned long and unsigned long64. My mistake.

Craig

--
------------------------------------------------------------ --------------
Craig B. Markwardt, Ph.D. EMAIL: craigmnet@REMOVEcow.physics.wisc.edu
Astrophysics, IDL, Finance, Derivatives | Remove "net" for better response
------------------------------------------------------------ --------------

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: Bug in ISHFT? (NOT) By: marc schellens[1] on Mon, 31 May 2004 23:07
		Re: Bug in ISHFT? (NOT) By: Craig Markwardt on Sun, 30 May 2004 21:06

Previous Topic:	Keywords in DLM
Next Topic:	About call_external, AUTO_GLUE and gcc

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Thu Oct 16 01:43:12 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.88253 seconds