comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » database connection with idl without dataminer
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: database connection with idl without dataminer [message #40224 is a reply to message #40130] Mon, 26 July 2004 08:06 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
pashas77 is currently offline  pashas77
Messages: 7
Registered: April 2003
Junior Member
I have a feeling, that I will use dlm's to implent the mysql-c api,
this seems too bad of an option. My inclination would be wrap a odbc
interface in an dlm, which is what dataminer essentially is. Man the
things you do to avoid buying something...:)

I very much apperciate your incite. Thank you

have a great day!

Sabir Pasha

Michael Wallace <mwallace.no.spam@no.spam.swri.edu.invalid> wrote in message news:<10g2plikuthbi27@corp.supernews.com>...
> Sabir Pasha wrote:
>> Thanks for your response. That's kinda what I figured. Do you mind
>> if I ask what database you guys are using. I'm playing the idea of
>> Mysql with a C interface. So i was just trying to gauge how much work
>> it would be.
>
> We are currently using Oracle in our production databases. However, I
> have played around with MySQL and there the only minor differences with
> regards to the database connectivity.
>
> To really gauge how much work it would be is dependent on whether you've
> done a lot of C database programming before. When I took on the task of
> integrating IDL and Java, it took a few hours to get something basic
> running, but I was already familiar with JDBC and the IDL-Java bridge.
>
>> Have a good one.
>
> I will. You too.
>
> -Mike
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: device,file=
Next Topic: ActiveX parameter by reference

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sat Oct 11 14:26:42 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.31895 seconds