comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: IDL on Windows vs. Unix, debugging consideration

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: IDL on Windows vs. Unix, debugging consideration

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: IDL on Windows vs. Unix, debugging consideration [message #40403 is a reply to message #40402]

Thu, 05 August 2004 12:48

Michael Wallace
Messages: 409
Registered: December 2003

Senior Member

Personally, I do ALL of my development work on *nix. Once the program
has been completely tested out on *nix, I will then check that it runs
the same way on Windows. All of the core logic has been debugged by
this point, so the only errors which would arise would be ones if
platform specific code managed to accidentally creep in. I also do the
same thing for my Java, Python, et al. programs -- develop on Linux and
test completely, then move them to Windows and make sure they still work
the same way. In short, I just develop by the credo "Spend as little
time as possible on Windows."

-Mike

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: IDL on Windows vs. Unix, debugging consideration By: Mark Hadfield on Sun, 08 August 2004 15:26
		Re: IDL on Windows vs. Unix, debugging consideration By: Ben Panter on Sat, 07 August 2004 01:38
		Re: IDL on Windows vs. Unix, debugging consideration By: R.G. Stockwell on Fri, 06 August 2004 18:24
		Re: IDL on Windows vs. Unix, debugging consideration By: Michael Wallace on Thu, 05 August 2004 20:47
		Re: IDL on Windows vs. Unix, debugging consideration By: David Fanning on Thu, 05 August 2004 13:00
		Re: IDL on Windows vs. Unix, debugging consideration By: Michael Wallace on Thu, 05 August 2004 12:48
		Re: IDL on Windows vs. Unix, debugging consideration By: David Fanning on Thu, 05 August 2004 10:31

Previous Topic:	Histogram question
Next Topic:	Saddam Hussein Found hanging in Jail Cell

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sat Oct 11 15:08:07 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.72130 seconds