comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » It seems that there is *a bit* polymorphism in IDL.

Home » Public Forums » archive » It seems that there is *a bit* polymorphism in IDL.

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: It seems that there is *a bit* polymorphism in IDL. [message #40539 is a reply to message #40464]

Thu, 12 August 2004 10:45

David Fanning
Messages: 11724
Registered: August 2001

Senior Member

JD Smith writes:

> At long last... legitimized access to the oft-defamed (and poorly
> named) ROUTINE_NAMES() variable functionality!

Oh, geez, JD. Read the rules! I hardly think a Member
in Good Standing Emeritus is qualified to submit an
entry to the contest. (Even if he doesn't have the
software installed.) :-(

> Very cool new _REF_EXTRA keyword in
> SCORE_VARFETCH should enable lots of neat functionality, including the
> one you mention (I presume you meant that one instead of
> SCOPE_VARNAME).

And no fair exposing this little bit of misdirection
to see if anyone was paying attention (or could read
the documentation).

Scheesh! I'm going to go talk to the Chairman. See
if we have any insurance for this kind of thing. :-(

Cheers,

David

P.S. Let's just say the Chairman doesn't like it when he
has to pay out on the very FIRST entry to his contest!

--
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		It seems that there is a bit polymorphism in IDL. By: tianyf on Wed, 11 August 2004 04:00
		Re: It seems that there is a bit polymorphism in IDL. By: David Fanning on Thu, 12 August 2004 12:43
		Re: It seems that there is a bit polymorphism in IDL. By: JD Smith on Thu, 12 August 2004 11:03
		Re: It seems that there is a bit polymorphism in IDL. By: David Fanning on Thu, 12 August 2004 10:45
		Re: It seems that there is a bit polymorphism in IDL. By: JD Smith on Thu, 12 August 2004 10:28
		Re: It seems that there is a bit polymorphism in IDL. By: David Fanning on Thu, 12 August 2004 07:08
		Re: It seems that there is a bit polymorphism in IDL. By: David Fanning on Wed, 11 August 2004 20:05
		Re: It seems that there is a bit polymorphism in IDL. By: David Fanning on Wed, 11 August 2004 14:51
		Re: It seems that there is a bit polymorphism in IDL. By: Mark Hadfield on Wed, 11 August 2004 14:34

Previous Topic:	Multiple IDL versions
Next Topic:	black window on fsc_surface & fsc_surface_log?

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sat Oct 11 03:55:16 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.88351 seconds

		It seems that there is a bit polymorphism in IDL. By: tianyf on Wed, 11 August 2004 04:00
		Re: It seems that there is a bit polymorphism in IDL. By: David Fanning on Thu, 12 August 2004 12:43
		Re: It seems that there is a bit polymorphism in IDL. By: JD Smith on Thu, 12 August 2004 11:03
		Re: It seems that there is a bit polymorphism in IDL. By: David Fanning on Thu, 12 August 2004 10:45
		Re: It seems that there is a bit polymorphism in IDL. By: JD Smith on Thu, 12 August 2004 10:28
		Re: It seems that there is a bit polymorphism in IDL. By: David Fanning on Thu, 12 August 2004 07:08
		Re: It seems that there is a bit polymorphism in IDL. By: David Fanning on Wed, 11 August 2004 20:05
		Re: It seems that there is a bit polymorphism in IDL. By: David Fanning on Wed, 11 August 2004 14:51
		Re: It seems that there is a bit polymorphism in IDL. By: Mark Hadfield on Wed, 11 August 2004 14:34