comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » widget IDs ever zero?

Home » Public Forums » archive » widget IDs ever zero?

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: widget IDs ever zero? [message #41198 is a reply to message #41052]

Fri, 24 September 2004 00:40

David Fanning
Messages: 11724
Registered: August 2001

Senior Member

Andrew Rodger wrote:

> I managed to find a solution yesterday after posting the message. I
> have created a function that lets the user find the widget ID of any
> realized widget by specifying the uname of the widget, rather than an
> id (which is the thing I lost in the first place), and lets face it we
> are more inclined to know the uname of our desired widget rather than
> the user id. We only want the widget ID on demand as per-normal. This
> has been great for set routines on compound widgets, finding the id of
> the widget containing the state (without having to maintain a constant
> link with the tlb). I will post it later today (WIDGET ID FINDING
> FUNCTION), let me know what you think. I am a little bit amazed that
> this isnt elsewhere (hope im not reinventing the wheel here).

Have you tried running more than one widget program at a time,
Andrew, each with the same UNAME for the storage widget? I'm
thinking your program might become a bit confused at that point. :-)

Which of the several managed widgets, each with the same UNAME
should you return?

Cheers,

David

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		widget IDs ever zero? By: Benjamin Hornberger on Thu, 09 September 2004 12:19
		Re: widget IDs ever zero? By: algosat on Thu, 23 September 2004 17:49
		Re: widget IDs ever zero? By: David Fanning on Fri, 24 September 2004 00:40
		Re: widget IDs ever zero? By: Mark Hadfield on Wed, 22 September 2004 19:43
		Re: widget IDs ever zero? By: algosat on Fri, 24 September 2004 18:35

Previous Topic:	Re: Colored image
Next Topic:	Unique system identified?

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 20:30:48 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.96410 seconds