| Re: PVI jerk toots own horn on net [flame; how'd you guess? : -] [message #415 is a reply to message #410] |
Thu, 20 August 1992 09:11  |
bradleyt
Messages: 4
Registered: March 1992
|
Junior Member |
|
|
In article <ALANS.92Aug19170731@abraham.juliet.ll.mit.edu> alans@ll.mit.edu (Alan Jay Stein) writes:
[Several personal attacks not worthy of comment deleted...]
> ***NOT!***
>
> First of all, this is no place to advertise! I can't believe PVI doesn't have a
> corporate policy prohibiting this, but I'm sure gonna find out now!
>
> And about giving you some credit:
>
> You charge way more for the same basic product, have no programmable X Widgets,
> and no IMSL link. And before you spout off about the NAG garbage, I'd like to
> remind you that this is a brain-dead, one for one parameter implementation, no
> easier than writing c-code which we can do without putting your kids through
> college. Apparantly, a few smart RSI engineers can do a lot more than a lot of
> stupid PV ones.
>
> And finally if you're working on a Unix box, can you really buy the "bigger
> is better" argument? IDL wins on price, and on features. In conclusion,
>
> *************> Stay Away from PVI, folks!!! Buy IDL!!! <****************
Geez, Al. Stop beating around the bush and tell us what you really
think! I mean, are you _for_ IDL or against it?
Todd.
--
| Todd Bradley -- Official Microsoft Spokesman
|
| WARNING/GUARANTEE: This message contains material which a truly
| free Society would neither fear nor suppress.
|
|
|
|
comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Members
Search
Help
Login
Home
