comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: MAP_SET vs MAP_PROJ_*
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: MAP_SET vs MAP_PROJ_* [message #41664 is a reply to message #41587] Wed, 10 November 2004 20:04 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
James Kuyper is currently offline  James Kuyper
Messages: 425
Registered: March 2000
Senior Member
Liam Gumley wrote:
> James Kuyper wrote:
>
>> Liam Gumley wrote:
>> ...
>>
>>> For example, how do do you define a Lambert Azimuthal Equal Area
>>> Projection in direct graphics centered at a given lat/lon with a
>>> specified resolution, such as 1000 meters per pixel?
>>
>>
>>
>> Since the pixels per centimeter can be different for the x and y axis,
>> you'll have to decide which axis it is that you want to be at 1000
>> meters per pixel. Assuming that it's the Y-axis, this should do it:
>>
>> lat = 22
>> lon = 90
>> resolution = 1000.0
>> MAP_SET,lat,lon,/LAMBERT,scale=resolution*100*!D.Y_PX_CM,/hi res,/grid,/label
>>
>>
>> You didn't ask for the coastlines, the grid, or the labels, but I
>> thought it would be good to have something to tell whether the MAP_SET
>> was correct.
>
>
> Thanks James, I am quite familiar with using MAP_SET in this fashion. I
> am interested in learning how to achieve the same result with the
> MAP_PROJ commands.

Sorry - I'm not familiar with MAP_PROJ, since it's not available in the
version of IDL installed on our machines. What does MAP_PROJ do that
makes it unacceptable to use MAP_SET instead?
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: Convert pixel values
Next Topic: dissapearing breakpoints

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Thu Oct 09 21:46:00 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.47924 seconds