comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive

Home » Public Forums » archive » IDL on SuSE v9.0?

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: IDL on SuSE [message #42391 is a reply to message #36820]

Wed, 26 January 2005 00:26

Bringfried Stecklum is currently offline

Bringfried Stecklum
Messages: 75
Registered: January 1996

Member

Michael Wallace wrote:
> The only supported Linux flavors according to RSI's documentation are
> Redhat versions. I can't think of any reason why IDL wouldn't work on
> SuSE, but was wondering if there would be any issues trying to get IDL
> installed and running on a SuSE box. Anyone running IDL under SuSE?
> Were there any hoops to jump through to make it work, or was it nice and
> smooth? The specific combination I'm interested in is IDL 6.1.1 and
> SuSE 9.1.
>
> TIA,
> Mike

Hi Mike,

I am using exactly the configuration you are interested in without any
problems. You have to set the kernel version to 2.4 otherwise it won't
work. Thus I inserted

export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1

as the very first line in sys5_idl_lmgrd. Furthermore, I enccountered
a slight problem with the cursor (reported earlier in this newsgroup)
which you can solve with

export XCURSOR_CORE=1

regards,

Bringfried

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		IDL on SuSE v9.0? By: spambob on Mon, 03 November 2003 09:10
		Re: IDL on SuSE v9.0? By: Nigel Wade on Thu, 06 November 2003 02:06
		Re: IDL on SuSE v9.0? By: tschulze on Thu, 06 November 2003 01:57
		Re: IDL on SuSE v9.0? By: Nigel Wade on Tue, 04 November 2003 07:28
		Re: IDL on SuSE By: war on Thu, 27 January 2005 18:22
		Re: IDL on SuSE By: judy on Thu, 27 January 2005 01:53
		Re: IDL on SuSE By: R.Bauer on Wed, 26 January 2005 06:28
		Re: IDL on SuSE By: Bringfried Stecklum on Wed, 26 January 2005 00:26

Previous Topic:	_extra and call_method
Next Topic:	How to extract a datarange from a multidimensional array?

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 17:08:15 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.79807 seconds