comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » IDL killer
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: IDL killer [message #43007 is a reply to message #42199] Mon, 14 March 2005 05:14 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
David Fanning is currently offline  David Fanning
Messages: 11724
Registered: August 2001
Senior Member
m_schellens@hotmail.com writes:

> ++(((a=1))=3)

I think it must be a general rule by now that any time
you fail to have a LHS of an expression in IDL (by, for
example, putting the RHS in parentheses and thereby
making it a temporary variable) there is an excellent
chance you will crash IDL. Just on the face of it,
I would guess there must be an almost unlimited
number of these expressions.

I'm not so sure this is a bug as much as it is a peek
into the underlying structure of the IDL code. In any
case, I'm not surprised by it any longer.

Cheers,

David
--
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: Modal dialog - returning values
Next Topic: GDL?

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 17:05:23 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00390 seconds