comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive

Home » Public Forums » archive » precedence question

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: precedence question [message #43130 is a reply to message #43003]

Tue, 15 March 2005 05:55

Foldy Lajos
Messages: 268
Registered: October 2001

Senior Member

On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, m_schellens@hotmail.com wrote:

> What do you want to hear?
> Obviously the docmentation is wrong here and brackets have a higher
> priority.
> marc
>

Well, I'd like to know whether it is a software bug, a documentation bug,
or simply I am reading something wrong. It is not obvious for me :-)

You voted for documentation bug, thanks.

David's Operator Precedence Tutorial has the same table, and refers to
'[]' and '.' as equal precedence operators, so it is wrong, too :-)

regards,
lajos

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		precedence question By: Foldy Lajos on Mon, 14 March 2005 10:35
		Re: precedence question By: David Fanning on Tue, 15 March 2005 06:42
		Re: precedence question By: Foldy Lajos on Tue, 15 March 2005 06:35
		Re: precedence question By: David Fanning on Tue, 15 March 2005 06:13
		Re: precedence question By: Foldy Lajos on Tue, 15 March 2005 05:55
		Re: precedence question By: JD Smith on Fri, 18 March 2005 15:45
		Re: precedence question By: marc schellens[1] on Tue, 15 March 2005 04:43
		Re: precedence question By: Foldy Lajos on Tue, 15 March 2005 01:42
		Re: precedence question By: marc schellens[1] on Mon, 14 March 2005 23:53

Previous Topic:	Forcing READ_ASCII output to be a set of strings...
Next Topic:	HIST_ND() used for resampling point data onto grid

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 03:31:30 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.40065 seconds