comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » PV-WAVE for Linux
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: PV-WAVE for Linux [message #4431 is a reply to message #4351] Wed, 31 May 1995 00:00 Go to previous message
atp is currently offline  atp
Messages: 1
Registered: May 1995
Junior Member
dave@image6.med.uth.tmc.edu (David Fenyes) writes:

>>>> >> "M" == M Larkum <larkum@pyl.unibe.ch> writes:
> In article <3pi6s2$lmq@aragorn.unibe.ch> larkum@pyl.unibe.ch (M Larkum) writes:

> We had been using IDL for Windows until we snatched PV-Wave or Linux
> from the net. The products are comparable, but the environment is so
> much better that we preferred PV-Wave/Linux over IDL/Windows.

Damn,
I look away for a moment, and I miss it. Never heard about
this. Normally the linux community is big on publicising this sort
of stuff.
Ah well. back to trying to get IDL for windows to run under
WINOS2 under DOSEMU under Linux.....

If the demo is still available anywhere, I'd appreciate an
E-mail with the location. We are an all IDL shop here, but I dont
use widgets myself so could make the transition to pv-wave.

> RSI is very evasive about a Linux port, and they don't seem to have
> scheduled a release :-(

Little bit annoyed about the complete lack of noises here.
filled in the RSI form + sent it off. We have asked the local distributors
about the progress, and no info has come back at all. If they just said
"no-way" then that would be better than keeping us hanging around.
----
Dear RSI,

Please let us know what you are up to. If you are not sure that
we are profitable enough for you, Then how about a statically linked
SCO-386 binary we could run under iBCS2 instead? That would shut
us up :-), and kill two birds with one stone.
----

Thanks for your time,
andy

OB IDL,
The 3.5.1 -> 3.6.1c (Alpha OSF) release changed something in how
the code segment was allocated. I have program that insists on crashing
under 3.5.1 with "% Program unit has too many local variables."
This is resistant to fiddling with the .size keyword. (yep, I know it
has to be the first command). Fixed in 3.6.1c.
Question - How can I get it to work under 3.5.[0-1] ? In some cases
upgrading is not "practical".

--
atp@mssly1.mssl.ucl.ac.uk Andy Phillips
atp@mssl.ucl.ac.uk Mullard Space Science Laboratory,
phillips@isass1.solar.isas.ac.jp Dept. Space and Climate Physics,
mssly1::atp University College London.
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: IDL 4.0 & HASP
Next Topic: non-interactive IDL from scripts

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 19:11:18 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.72045 seconds