comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Why IDL needs Garbage Collection
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Why IDL needs Garbage Collection [message #44913 is a reply to message #44891] Thu, 21 July 2005 11:40 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Dick Jackson is currently offline  Dick Jackson
Messages: 347
Registered: August 1998
Senior Member
"JD Smith" <jdsmith@as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:pan.2005.07.20.21.24.42.658685@as.arizona.edu...
>
> IDL pointers are great. [...]
>
> This is why RSI needs to implement a simple but effective garbage
> collection paradigm in the next version of IDL. Anyone agree?

(Just to clarify, the issue here is "Why IDL needs *Automatic* Garbage
Collection", as we do have manual Heap_GC as you point out)

Absolutely. I did a lot of work using LISP some years ago, and I recall how
often I could breeze through some programming tasks without having to worry
about the cleanup. It makes for more carefree (not careless!) work.

I'm with you on this, JD.

For anyone who wants to read a nice article on the issue:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garbage_collection_%28computer_ science%29

Cheers,
--
-Dick

Dick Jackson / dick@d-jackson.com
D-Jackson Software Consulting / http://www.d-jackson.com
Calgary, Alberta, Canada / +1-403-242-7398 / Fax: 241-7392
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Multithreading in IDL
Next Topic: ION-SCRIPT <INPUT TYPE=FILE> help ?

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sat Oct 11 11:50:22 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.68248 seconds