comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: Bug in operator precedence

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Bug in operator precedence

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Bug in operator precedence [message #45167]

Wed, 17 August 2005 00:05

Foldy Lajos
Messages: 268
Registered: October 2001

Senior Member

hi,

RSI does the same, it has constructs like

if (measure eq 3 && ~N_ELEMENTS(powerIn)) then ...

in his library, which rely on ~ having higher precedence than &&.

regards,
lajos

On Wed, 17 Aug 2005, Mark Hadfield wrote:

> * Like many people, I don't bother to read the manual unless I
> really need to, and I have code that relies on what IDL does,
> not what the manual says it should do.

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: Bug in operator precedence By: Foldy Lajos on Wed, 17 August 2005 00:05
		Re: Bug in operator precedence By: marc schellens[1] on Tue, 16 August 2005 20:18
		Re: Bug in operator precedence By: Peter Mason on Tue, 16 August 2005 15:47
		Re: Bug in operator precedence By: Mark Hadfield on Tue, 16 August 2005 15:20
		Re: Bug in operator precedence By: marc schellens[1] on Tue, 16 August 2005 01:56
		Re: Bug in operator precedence By: Foldy Lajos on Tue, 16 August 2005 01:43

Previous Topic:	Install ENVI/IDL on cygwin
Next Topic:	Re: Install ENVI/IDL on cygwin

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 13:55:47 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00479 seconds