comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive

Home » Public Forums » archive » reverse problem

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: reverse problem [message #46174 is a reply to message #46053]

Fri, 04 November 2005 14:03

savoie
Messages: 68
Registered: September 1996

Member

"R.G. Stockwell" <no@email.please> writes:

> hmmmm, but now that you mention it, I think I'd rather
> have it as a global option and change () to [] when it breaks,
> than put a compiler option in every piece of code I write.

I'll second this. Additionally, it's against pleasing aesthetics to have to
put a complier option at the beginning of every single freaking routine.

Matt

--
Matthew Savoie - Scientific Programmer
National Snow and Ice Data Center
(303) 735-0785 http://nsidc.org

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		reverse problem By: news.qwest.net on Thu, 03 November 2005 16:24
		Re: reverse problem By: David Fanning on Fri, 04 November 2005 14:31
		Re: reverse problem By: savoie on Fri, 04 November 2005 14:03
		Re: reverse problem By: news.qwest.net on Fri, 04 November 2005 13:16
		Re: reverse problem By: David Fanning on Fri, 04 November 2005 12:27
		Re: reverse problem By: news.qwest.net on Fri, 04 November 2005 10:42
		Re: reverse problem By: David Fanning on Fri, 04 November 2005 09:22
		Re: reverse problem By: news.qwest.net on Fri, 04 November 2005 09:04
		Re: reverse problem By: MarioIncandenza on Fri, 04 November 2005 08:59
		Re: reverse problem By: Paolo Grigis on Fri, 04 November 2005 08:25
		Re: reverse problem By: liamgumley on Fri, 04 November 2005 07:41
		Re: reverse problem By: news.qwest.net on Fri, 04 November 2005 07:38

Previous Topic:	online help IDL 6.2
Next Topic:	Printinf Latitudes & Longitudes in a MAP using IDL

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sat Oct 11 11:33:48 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.95892 seconds