comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Best platform for IDL 6.2?
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Best platform for IDL 6.2? [message #46336 is a reply to message #46335] Wed, 16 November 2005 12:46 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Mark Hadfield is currently offline  Mark Hadfield
Messages: 783
Registered: May 1995
Senior Member
R.G. Stockwell wrote:
> ...
> My 2cents,
> IDL works well on a windows platform.

I'll second that. I have used IDL with Windows since 1993 and am
reasonably happy with it. A couple of years ago I added Linux (Red Hat
7.?) with a dual boot setup and intended to make the transition to
Linux, but after a month or so I decided it was going to several months
more before I could be as productive in Linux as I was in Windows, and I
couldn't really justify this to my employer. When I get my next PC, I
will probably install both Windows and Linux, but this time using VMware
so I can run both at the same time. The Windows-Linux choice didn't
depend only on IDL but that was a major factor

Pluses (Windows vs Linux) are:

* The IDLDE environment is quite nice on Windows and woeful on
Unix.
* Graphics performance was somewhat better on Windows.
(Originally I found IDL on Linux *very* slow, but I traced
this to a setting like RETAIN. I posted about this on this
newsgroup.) Last time I checked, IDL/Linux was still 30-40%
slower for graphics than IDL/Windows on the same hardware.
I know Karl Schulz has put some work into this, so this may
not be true any more.
* The IDL2AVI DLM is very nice--I use it all the time.

Minuses (Windows vs Linux):

* Can't integrate properly with (X)emacs and IDLWAVE. The
problem is the lack of a console-mode IDL executable on
Windows. It would not be difficult for RSI to produce such
a thing but they choose not to. I do use Xemacs & IDLWAVE
to edit files but then have to switch back to IDLDE to
compile & run. This works better than you might think,
but still...
* Poorer memory handling. This has only become an issue for me
in the last year or so, as dataset sizes have increased. It's
still not a *serious* problem.


--
Mark Hadfield "Kei puwaha te tai nei, Hoea tahi tatou"
m.hadfield@niwa.co.nz
National Institute for Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA)
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: exporting image data from command line
Next Topic: subscripting arrays

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 12:27:23 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.71817 seconds