comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Best platform for IDL 6.2?
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Best platform for IDL 6.2? [message #46363 is a reply to message #46362] Tue, 15 November 2005 18:33 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
David Fanning is currently offline  David Fanning
Messages: 11724
Registered: August 2001
Senior Member
Bas writes:

> I was curious what platform seems to be the best for running IDL. I
> have read some of the topics and it seems some platforms have problems.
>
> Currently I run a Apple with OS10.4. I was thinking of upgrading to a
> Sun or SGI workstation. I just wanted some opinions and any
> experiences you have had with IDL on your platforms.

I'd stick with the Mac. That deal where you can slide around to
from one desktop to another is *definitely* worth the price of
admission. And the keyboard just feels so unbelievably
luxurious. Not to mention the great screen saver that shows
all the photos from your trip to Hawaii. You'll hardly notice
that your IDL code... uh, doesn't run so well. :-)

Cheers,

David

P.S. Did I mention you can hook your iPod up to it?



--
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: exporting image data from command line
Next Topic: subscripting arrays

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 00:39:55 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.32401 seconds