comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Large array memory problem.
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Large array memory problem. [message #46500 is a reply to message #46398] Sun, 27 November 2005 01:22 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
R.Bauer is currently offline  R.Bauer
Messages: 1424
Registered: November 1998
Senior Member
Rick Towler wrote:

> On a related note, is anyone using IDL x86-64 for linux?
>
> -Rick

Yes,
we have several dual opterons using it in 64 bit.

By one of the last security updates of the kernel I believe we can't start
idl with the -32 option on these machines.
But this doesn't matter. 64 bit is great.


cheers
Reimar



>
>
>
> Carolina wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am running IDL 5.5 in a computer that has 2GB of RAM and a paging
>> file size of 4GB. However it seems that IDL will not give more than
>> about 1.2GB for array storage per IDL session. Unfortunately, I need to
>> do an array multiplication where the arrays are double precision
>> complex 11000 by 11000 square arrays, and IDL will not even give me
>> enough memory for a single dcomplexarr(6500,6500) array!
>>
>> Am I being too ambitious? Could anyone please tell me if it is possible
>> to store such a large array?
>>
>> I though IDL was the best language for large array manipulations, is it
>> true? or are there other languages that are better suited for this?
>>
>> Many thanks for your time,
>>
>> Carolina.
>>
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: My code is way to slow.. How can I optimize!?
Next Topic: the fastest way to find number of points in sphere(radius r)

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sat Oct 11 20:00:42 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.68031 seconds