comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Pass by value and performance
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Pass by value and performance [message #46706 is a reply to message #46703] Wed, 14 December 2005 09:08 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
David Fanning is currently offline  David Fanning
Messages: 11724
Registered: August 2001
Senior Member
Paul Van Delst writes:

> In the context of this thread (and your example below), shouldn't one say that
> /dereferenced/ pointers are just regular IDL variables (i.e. they're not expressions) ??
>
> I don't think I'm splitting hairs here (or am I?)

No, I think that is what I meant. I was just so darned
excited about knowing *why* this answer was true I mis-spoke. :-)

> It makes me wonder though - have IDL pointers always behaved that way, or is it a moving
> target (ala relaxed structure definitions post IDL 5.3 talked about in another thread) ?

I think they have always behaved this way. But often these things
are introduced without, uh, too much fanfare, and it takes everyone
a while to catch up.

Cheers,

David

--
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: idl job posting
Next Topic: Recursive Function Program in IDL

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Thu Oct 09 20:10:13 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.56031 seconds