comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Dual Core Apple "MacBook", and RSI's Mac Intel plans
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Dual Core Apple "MacBook", and RSI's Mac Intel plans [message #46959 is a reply to message #46940] Fri, 13 January 2006 14:29 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Kenneth P. Bowman is currently offline  Kenneth P. Bowman
Messages: 585
Registered: May 2000
Senior Member
In article <pan.2006.01.13.17.56.06.516548@as.arizona.edu>,
JD Smith <jdsmith@as.arizona.edu> wrote:

> On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:55:32 +0000, Ricardo Bugalho wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> a couple of points, depending on your interest: - Mac OS X for Intel won't
>> emulate Altivec. So, if IDL makes any use of it, IDL might not run. OTOH,
>> unlike SSE, Altivec never supported double precision so it's likely IDL
>> won't use it. - If you don't care about Mac OS X and just want Apple's
>> tradicional quality in laptops, you might be able to install Linux on it.
>
> It turns out IDL does use a small bit of Altivec on a very few basic
> operations. I had thought it used none, but was corrected. So this
> means that IDL likely will *not* run under Rosetta (the new
> on-they-fly PPC->Intel translator). The main question is, does IDL
> run on a G3 processor? It certainly used to, back in the day, so it
> probably still does, which means when Rosetta tells IDL it is a G3, it
> may well fall back on some slower code and not choke. SSE is another
> kettle of fish. In a year's time, probably well over 75% of IDL's
> user base will be running on the same processor architecture.
> Thinking about using SSE/SIMD is probably a good idea (and they are).
>
> JD

This is from one of the Mac rumor sites:

> In a note to clients on Friday, American Technology Research analyst Shaw Wu
> said checks with sources indicate that the upcoming release of Mac OS X
> 10.4.4 for Intel runs well, with noticeable improvements to the Rosetta
> PowerPC emulation environment that improve backward compatibility with
> AltiVec support.
>
> "We believe this will alleviate concerns that older software that hasn't been
> ported to Intel will run well without a recompile," Wu wrote.

But I suspect this is minor compared to ensuring that third party
software runs.

Ken Bowman
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Retrieve data without opening the XROI window
Next Topic: Re: Retrieve data without opening the XROI window

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 17:32:48 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00625 seconds