comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Linux Help Needed
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Linux Help Needed [message #47240 is a reply to message #47134] Fri, 27 January 2006 18:25 Go to previous message
Paul Van Delst[1] is currently offline  Paul Van Delst[1]
Messages: 1157
Registered: April 2002
Senior Member
JD Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 12:22:01 -0700, David Fanning wrote:
>
>
>> Sid writes:
>
>
>> By the way, I am *really* getting into this. If I wanted
>> to buy a new laptop with LINUX installed and ready to go,
>> what would you LIXUX users recommend? I need a pretty
>> powerful machine for a new proposed project.
>
>
> Installing Linux is usually trivial these days. I'd shop for the
> laptop you want (I hear good things about the new Core Due systems),
> with the features you want, and then head to:
>
> http://www.linux-laptop.net/
>
> to see if there any compatibility issues (sound cards are common). Mostly
> things do indeed just work.
>
> The reason IDL complains is that it needs an old, old version of the C
> library and other libs, which most distros offer as a "compatibility"
> library install. You can blame RSI for this, building against what is
> essentially a 4 year old library set (not that it doesn't work).

That's just laughable.

> If the Macbook Pro's are as nice as they seem to be, getting one of
> those, and dual-booting linux/OSX would seem a rather nice solution.
> Redhat recently officially announced support for Mac Intel. It would
> be interesting to see how much Linux/IDL 6.2 cleans up OSX/IDL 6.2
> Rosetta (assuming it runs), and then repeat the comparison when they
> finally compile IDL for OSX/Intel later this year (hopefully).
>
> I have friends in the laptop market now, and no clear RSI statement on
> their commitment to support this new architecture is unsettling to
> them. "We'll look into and get back to you" is less than
> confidence-inspiring.

From my uneducated viewpoint, RSI always seems to be playing catch-up in this regard.

On the plus side (and off on a tangent - crikey, it's late), I bit the bullet and spent an
hour plotting gobs and gobs of data using iPlot and, somewhere, somehow, I managed to
figure out how to use it effectively despite the clunkiness of the "Visualization
Browser". Even with the slowness of the application I guess I'm, well, impressed. (off I
go into the corner to eat my hat.... )

paulv

--
Paul van Delst
CIMSS @ NOAA/NCEP/EMC
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: q5/ ***Hot stuff - check this out !!! q5/
Next Topic: Fastest Nearest Neighbor Calculation

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 15:39:14 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.05125 seconds