comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Fractional Pixels Origin?
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Fractional Pixels Origin? [message #47549 is a reply to message #47548] Thu, 16 February 2006 16:02 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
David Fanning is currently offline  David Fanning
Messages: 11724
Registered: August 2001
Senior Member
Wayne Landsman writes:

> I'll say that the FITS convention is that [0,0] locates
> the center of the pixel. (This differs from most other
> image processing standards where [0.,0.] defines the lower
> lefthand corner.)


Then, JD Smith writes:

> FITS does indeed use [0.0,0.0]. I'd urge those of you making the
> choice for your programs to save the world confusion, and adopt the
> "natural" choice: pixels centered on [a.5,b.5].

I'm confused. :-(

I thought Wayne was saying that the center of the first
pixel was at [0,0], which would mean the pixel spanned
the distance (on my ruler) of -0.5 to 0.5. JD seems to
contradict this.

I'm not sure when (if ever) I am going to *use* fractional
pixels, but I would like to understand it. :-)

Cheers,

David
--
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: naming PS plots: variable+ string?
Next Topic: IDLWAVE 6.0 -- idlwave.org

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 11:11:35 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00585 seconds