comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Unhappy plotter
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Unhappy plotter [message #48192] Thu, 06 April 2006 15:41 Go to previous message
Cliff is currently offline  Cliff
Messages: 11
Registered: April 2006
Junior Member
In the beginning I used add ons to Fortran to visualise my data, so
when I came across PV-WAVE it was like a miracle appearing on my
desktop. Then came IDL, widgets, pointers etc etc. I was a happy
plotter. I started to write applications and soon found direct graphics
a little clunky. Then came objects - much more like it and I was a
anticipative plotter. Then came object graphics, oops, it was like the
wind was knocked from my sails. Why oh why are they so complicated?
Then I found MATLAB, this is how graphics should work. Make a plot and
you have a functional oo plotting system - like LIVE_PLOT on acid. I
jumped with joy in anticipation when I heard of the arrival of iTools.
Ooops, why oh why oh why? Complicated, indecipherable and unusable
unless of course one has a spare month or two for the learning curve
(my boss would not be happy). Suppose I'll have to carry on using DGs
for my applications. Am I just dim? It's not like I'm an IDL novice.
Does anyone else feel this way? oh and why can't object methods be used
as widget events. Moan over ...
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: IDL 6.2 Array Definition Question (Program code area full)
Next Topic: Google Maps lookup for ENVI

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Thu Oct 09 07:22:27 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.40118 seconds