comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Introducing FL
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Introducing FL [message #48242 is a reply to message #48144] Tue, 04 April 2006 16:28 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
George N. White III is currently offline  George N. White III
Messages: 56
Registered: September 2000
Member
On Tue, 4 Apr 2006, Paul Van Delst wrote:

> Y.T. wrote:
> [...]
>> At my place of employ I can get Matlab for free (i.e. site-license) but
>> I'd be horribly worthless with Matlab because I'd be spending my time
>> re-re-relearning when and where to place a comma or a semicolon and
>> what was the syntax for a linear fit again? So I use GDL, because that
>> allows me to get something *done*. As in *now*.
>
> That, of course, is very important but....
>>
>> (I work for a federally funded research facility and you, the
>> tax-payer, are expending my salary. Do you really think you're getting
>> your money's worth out of the deal if I spend my time learning this
>> years fad-language?)
>
> Yes, actually (being a taxpayer who also happens to work at a federally
> funded research facility). Learning new programming languages is not unlike
> learning new spoken languages (except easier IMO). It broadens one's horizon
> to make different solution methodologies available. In some cases they may
> help your work, others not. I would be a foolish taxpayer if I expected you
> to not expend time learning new stuff that may make your job easier and more
> efficient. And, of course, there's the "personal improvement" aspect -- ya
> gotta be happy at what you do. :o)
>
> paulv
>
> p.s. I would love to get a matlab site license - even though I barely know
> enough matlab for the "hello world" chestnut. Until then, learning Ruby and
> Python while I wait for Fortran2003 compilers will have to do. :o)

I also work at a government funded research facility where we have had
Matlab longer than we have had IDL (since the days when Cleve Moler worked
for Ardent). I have coded a number of core algorithms we use in both
Matlab and IDL as a sort of crib sheet for post-docs (many have worked
with Matlab, few with IDL). For my work, Matlab suffers in comparison to
IDL because (like S+) it encourages you to use doubles, but (unlike S+) it
lacks missing value support which is important for the things I do where
doubles are appropriate. If I needed sparse arrays I wouldn't mind the
doubles so much, but these days I'm more interested in finding tools that
support the OpenEXR 16-bit floating pt. format.

All these languages handle 75-80% of the problems I have without
straining. Where they differ is in the interests of the user community
and in the ability to handle the other 20-25% of the problems without
asking for money to upgrade my hardware.

--
George N. White III <aa056@chebucto.ns.ca>
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: iTools/interactive Analysis >
Next Topic: Anything in IDL like R's Copy to Clipboard As a Metafile?

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 17:41:03 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00503 seconds