comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » 6.3 reactions?
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: 6.3 reactions? [message #48672 is a reply to message #48556] Tue, 09 May 2006 11:59 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
JD Smith is currently offline  JD Smith
Messages: 850
Registered: December 1999
Senior Member
On Tue, 09 May 2006 11:50:59 -0600, David Fanning wrote:

> codepod@gmail.com writes:
>
>> The following code gives an idea of how this can work. Note: This isn't
>> exact, but should outline how the IDL-IDL bridge is used.
>
> Off-loading a compute intense process only really seems
> to make sense if you can off-load it to a computer or
> processor that is underutilized. Is there any way to
> direct the bridge to run on a particular processor
> (assuming a multi-processor system) or a particular
> machine on the network?

In terms of processor allocation: that's the operating system
scheduler's job, and it usually does a good one (depending on OS). I
think a good analogy for what you could do with this is iMovie,
Apple's easy video editing software. When you render an effect on a
clip, it gets done in the background, allowing you to continue to
re-organize and name clips, import more data, start other rendering
processes, etc. Even on a single processor chip, the usability is
*greatly* enhanced by not having to sit there twiddling your thumbs
for 45s while some complicated render completes. I think it needs an
easy hook for progress in Status(), not just "done" or "not done".

JD
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: IDLWAVE and starting a comment on a new line
Next Topic: Re: changing a datatype in a structure

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sat Nov 29 09:01:59 PST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.27995 seconds