comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » 6.3 reactions?
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: 6.3 reactions? [message #48680 is a reply to message #48556] Mon, 08 May 2006 13:25 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
JD Smith is currently offline  JD Smith
Messages: 850
Registered: December 1999
Senior Member
On Mon, 08 May 2006 07:29:54 -0700, codepod wrote:

> JD, the implementation is simpler than what you outline. The object is
> only present on the "parent" process, so the actual object instance
> data is not shared between the processes. The child process has no
> indication it's being run as a worker: it just receives commands and
> executes them. IDL variables are transferred between the processes by
> the bridge using shared memory. The parent process can Get or Set
> variables in the child process. Overall it's a very simple interface
> that brings a powerful new dimension to IDL applications.

Thanks for the info. Does Get/Set actually copy variables, or
just provide references in shared memory (which of course would require
IDL setting up the existing heap for sharing)? That would allow you to
Get/Set self in an object, and have it operated on independently in both
sides.

JD
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: IDLWAVE and starting a comment on a new line
Next Topic: Re: changing a datatype in a structure

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Thu Oct 09 20:47:45 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.24288 seconds