comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » 6.3 reactions?
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: 6.3 reactions? [message #48682 is a reply to message #48556] Mon, 08 May 2006 07:29 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
codepod is currently offline  codepod
Messages: 19
Registered: March 2006
Junior Member
JD, the implementation is simpler than what you outline. The object is
only present on the "parent" process, so the actual object instance
data is not shared between the processes. The child process has no
indication it's being run as a worker: it just receives commands and
executes them. IDL variables are transferred between the processes by
the bridge using shared memory. The parent process can Get or Set
variables in the child process. Overall it's a very simple interface
that brings a powerful new dimension to IDL applications.

Also as you mention, this is an independent process so resources are
not shared between them.

The underlying process management technology used in the bridge is
actually used in several places currently in IDL (Export Bridges,
LabView script node) and will enable some amazing new technology that
should be shown later this year.

-CP
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: IDLWAVE and starting a comment on a new line
Next Topic: Re: changing a datatype in a structure

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 17:58:47 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00461 seconds