comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive

Home » Public Forums » archive » More OO jargon

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: More OO jargon [message #49471 is a reply to message #49415]

Tue, 25 July 2006 15:24

JD Smith
Messages: 850
Registered: December 1999

Senior Member

On Mon, 24 Jul 2006 18:25:22 -0700, Robbie wrote:

> I may be re-inventing the wheel, but I'm doing it one spoke at a time. My
> atom class and control class are each useful in their own right and can be
> used independantly.
>
> I haven't seen publically released code which address the problems which I
> have. iTools does not help me develop the end-user applications which I
> have in mind. My only option is to create my own library based on concepts
> which I have learnt from other langauges.

No worries... I think it's great more people are thinking about this. My
comment was meant to point out that it must be a real and important issue
if it's been re-implemented many times by different people. Creating
large, inter-locking applications using the normal widget event model is
just too constraining.

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		More OO jargon By: Robbie on Sat, 22 July 2006 16:48
		Re: More OO jargon By: JD Smith on Tue, 25 July 2006 15:24

Previous Topic:	IPLOT lockup problem
Next Topic:	Re: Doing chi square and/or lognormal fits to 1D data?

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sat Oct 11 02:36:41 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.60048 seconds