comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: More OO jargon

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: More OO jargon [message #49482 is a reply to message #49401]

Mon, 24 July 2006 18:25

Robbie
Messages: 165
Registered: February 2006

Senior Member

I may be re-inventing the wheel, but I'm doing it one spoke at a time.
My atom class and control class are each useful in their own right and
can be used independantly.

I haven't seen publically released code which address the problems
which I have. iTools does not help me develop the end-user applications
which I have in mind. My only option is to create my own library based
on concepts which I have learnt from other langauges.

I think that there it is possible to find an ideal object design of
event processing, widget managment, graphics management, data model,
macros etc.. using IDL. I thought through a number of designs before
choosing the one I liked. It's then a matter of collating those ideas
together into a single package and developing a rich set of UI features
to complement it.

Robbie
http://www.barnett.id.au/idl/

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: More OO jargon By: JD Smith on Mon, 24 July 2006 09:59
		Re: More OO jargon By: Robbie on Mon, 24 July 2006 18:25
		Re: More OO jargon By: David Fanning on Sat, 05 August 2006 23:55

Previous Topic:	Re: Seconds to UTC date
Next Topic:	nearest number

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 01:59:24 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.44083 seconds