comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: PU license horror

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: PU license horror

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: PU license horror [message #49534 is a reply to message #49533]

Fri, 28 July 2006 09:02

mchinand
Messages: 66
Registered: September 1996

Member

In article <1154100360.199001.233730@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
Haje Korth <haje.korth@jhuapl.edu> wrote:
> Hi,

> So the question is whether I can circumvent the problem doing the
> following: Install Linux on the machine, install IDL with PU license,
> and then access this IDL for Linux installation via an X Client. Does
> IDL for Linux allow this operation, or does it check for an X session
> and block IDL from running as well?
>
> Comments highly appreciated...
>

I'm not sure what a PU license is, but normally IDL use one license (or 6, actually) for each DISPLAY
on Linux and other Unix OSes. So multiple instances of IDL on the same DISPLAY (e.g., :0.0) use only
one set of licenses. I just checked with lmstat and oddly enough, I'm using 6 licenses for DISPLAY :0
and 6 more for :0.0.

--Mike Chinander

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: PU license horror By: Haje Korth on Fri, 28 July 2006 09:29
		Re: PU license horror By: Haje Korth on Fri, 28 July 2006 09:25
		Re: PU license horror By: mchinand on Fri, 28 July 2006 09:02
		Re: PU license horror By: Foldy Lajos on Fri, 28 July 2006 09:00

Previous Topic:	2D mesh data structure from watershed boundaries or the skeleton of a binary image?
Next Topic:	kernel convolution?

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sun Oct 12 00:26:33 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.63526 seconds