comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: iplot, /xlog

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: iplot, /xlog [message #49882 is a reply to message #49876]

Fri, 18 August 2006 14:41

Michael Galloy
Messages: 1114
Registered: April 2006

Senior Member

David Fanning wrote:
> P.S. This is a problem with keyword inheritance. It is easy to
> write code that allows you to use the wrong keywords without
> error, but also without effect. At the end of the chain, there
> should be a _STRICT_EXTRA=extra statement to catch this kind
> of thing.

I agree this is a major pain with the iTools. I think the problem is
that the iTool creation routine passes the keywords to multiple other
routines. In this case _STRICT_EXTRA can't be used on any individual
call since the a given keyword might be accepted in some other call.

Mike
--
www.michaelgalloy.com

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: iplot, /xlog By: David Fanning on Fri, 18 August 2006 19:03
		Re: iplot, /xlog By: David Fanning on Fri, 18 August 2006 18:52
		Re: iplot, /xlog By: Kenneth P. Bowman on Fri, 18 August 2006 18:30
		Re: iplot, /xlog By: Michael Galloy on Fri, 18 August 2006 14:41
		Re: iplot, /xlog By: David Fanning on Fri, 18 August 2006 14:36
		Re: iplot, /xlog By: Benjamin Hornberger on Fri, 18 August 2006 13:49
		Re: iplot, /xlog By: David Fanning on Fri, 18 August 2006 13:27

Previous Topic:	Re: oplot for plots
Next Topic:	another request for help with getting rid of for loops...

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sat Oct 11 10:16:11 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.35809 seconds