comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: @make vs command line for creating .sav files.

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: @make vs command line for creating .sav files.

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: @make vs command line for creating .sav files. [message #50262 is a reply to message #50261]

Thu, 21 September 2006 09:50

David Fanning
Messages: 11724
Registered: August 2001

Senior Member

savoie@nsidc.org writes:

> O.k. I've searched google but I'm not finding the answer.
>
> First I'm wondering why and @file on the command line acts differently
> from typing the commands in one at a time.

Humm. Well, it works both ways with IDL 6.2 on Windows.
If I had to guess, I would say your path is not getting
set properly after the .reset when running from the @ sign.
You might try printing !PATH before the call to RESOLVE_ALL
to see if that is the case.

Cheers,

David
--
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
Sepore ma de ni thui. ("Perhaps thou speakest truth.")

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: @make vs command line for creating .sav files. By: Jean H. on Thu, 21 September 2006 10:53
		Re: @make vs command line for creating .sav files. By: David Fanning on Thu, 21 September 2006 10:45
		Re: @make vs command line for creating .sav files. By: David Fanning on Thu, 21 September 2006 10:33
		Re: @make vs command line for creating .sav files. By: Allan Whiteford on Thu, 21 September 2006 10:13
		Re: @make vs command line for creating .sav files. By: David Fanning on Thu, 21 September 2006 09:50

Previous Topic:	@make vs command line for creating .sav files.
Next Topic:	Re: @make vs command line for creating .sav files.

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sun Oct 12 09:41:35 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 2.00681 seconds