comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: resolving specific pro, functions inside of a file

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: resolving specific pro, functions inside of a file

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: resolving specific pro, functions inside of a file [message #50848 is a reply to message #50847]

Sat, 21 October 2006 19:47

Dominic[1]
Messages: 13
Registered: October 2006

Junior Member

Hey David,

I have never been called a Zen priest but I guess it is a step forward
from being called a Homeland Security agent... but here is what I am
actually doing:
My goal is to create automatic lineage tracing for IDL. So, when a
researcher runs an idl program to create some data products, the
execution will be automatically and transparently traced. When a
researcher needs to know how certain data products were created, he can
query the traces and see what was called to create these data products.
Now, for IDL we are trying to achieve this with wrapper functions
(automatically generated).

Sorry to disappoint you...

dometz

David Fanning wrote:
> Dominic writes:
>
>> Is it possible to use RESOLVE_ROUTINE on a single procedure inside of a
>> file? So, I ONLY want to resolve procedure bar but NOT foo.
>>
>> file: foo.pro:
>>
>> pro bar
>> print, "bar"
>> end
>>
>> pro foo
>> print, "foo"
>> end
>
> I pondered this question as I cleared away the dishes
> from dinner tonight. And then suddenly it hit me! I've
> thought all along you were a Homeland Security agent,
> but now I see how wrong I was. You are a Zen priest,
> and these questions are koans for us! I apologize for
> not understanding sooner, Master.
>
> I see now that each question is a progression deeper
> and deeper into the unconscious self. They force us
> to wrestle with words that cannot be spoken, and with
> thoughts that transcend thinking. Leading us toward
> the Mystery of all life.
>
> In that sense, each posting here is a small poem,
> a sequence of questions similar to those asked by
> Pablo Neruda in The Book of Questions:
>
> XXXV
>
> Will our life not be a tunnel
> between two vague clarities?
>
> Or will it not be a clarity
> between two dark triangles?
>
> Or will life not be a fish
> prepared to be a bird?
>
> Will death consist of non-being
> or of dangerous substances?
>
> I thank you for your great kindness, Sir.
>
> Cheers,
>
> David
> --
> David Fanning, Ph.D.
> Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
> Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
> Sepore ma de ni thui. ("Perhaps thou speakest truth.")

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: resolving specific pro, functions inside of a file By: David Fanning on Sat, 21 October 2006 21:15
		Re: resolving specific pro, functions inside of a file By: Dominic[1] on Sat, 21 October 2006 21:04
		Re: resolving specific pro, functions inside of a file By: David Fanning on Sat, 21 October 2006 20:38
		Re: resolving specific pro, functions inside of a file By: Dominic[1] on Sat, 21 October 2006 19:50
		Re: resolving specific pro, functions inside of a file By: Dominic[1] on Sat, 21 October 2006 19:47
		Re: resolving specific pro, functions inside of a file By: David Fanning on Sat, 21 October 2006 17:56
		Re: resolving specific pro, functions inside of a file By: Andrew Cool on Sun, 22 October 2006 18:01

Previous Topic:	fast search
Next Topic:	Re: shapiro wilks test

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 19:25:20 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00424 seconds