comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: !P.SYMSIZE still broken? after 5 years?
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: !P.SYMSIZE still broken? after 5 years? [message #50971 is a reply to message #50970] Wed, 25 October 2006 18:36 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
cgguido is currently offline  cgguido
Messages: 195
Registered: August 2005
Senior Member
It's all very sad :'(

David Fanning wrote:
>
> I thought only MY complaints got on the "low priority" list!
> Holes in contour plots, NLEVELS keywords that give an arbitrary
> number of levels, decent direct graphics fonts ....

RSI/ITTVIS seem quite evenhanded apparently :-)

>
> Welcome to the direct graphics dead letter box. :-)

I hope you are not saying direct graphics is dead? just the letter box,
right? why is the latter dead if the former is not? or am I missing
something?

> This train has come and gone!

Should I be jumping off and trying to catch the next one? Is this train
to the future called object graphics? I must admit I have NEVER
knowingly used an object in IDL - only fooled around in Java a long
time ago. Where's a good place to start? I am quite confused...

As for !P.SYMSIZE and PLOT/OPLOT, I think I will just try to write
UBERPLOT/UBEROPLOT so that it explicitly uses the !P value...

Thanks,
Gianguido
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: Commutativity of multiplication
Next Topic: Re: Mac 64-bit

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Thu Oct 09 03:30:25 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 3.19375 seconds