comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Interesting Rant
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Interesting Rant [message #51313 is a reply to message #51312] Tue, 14 November 2006 10:36 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Paul Van Delst[1] is currently offline  Paul Van Delst[1]
Messages: 1157
Registered: April 2002
Senior Member
David Fanning wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Someone sent me a link to this interesting IDL rant this morning:
>
> http://www.sccs.swarthmore.edu/users/07/sstvinc2/research/st upid.html

Hee hee. I thought it was pretty funny. I probably would've done something similar back
when I was one of dem young whippersnappers (well, I would've if anything but Fortran was
available....)

Apart from the fact that some of the info was just wrong, the rant shows the writers lack
of experience with programming languages in general. To say nothing of exiting college and
entering the real world where being able to distinguish and effectively handle the
differences between the the way things *should* be and the way they actually *are* are a
definite plus.

Ah... the innocence and passion of youth. :o)

Seeing as the ranter states he/she is a CS major, I think the following quote is somewhat
topically pithy (seeing as the original article was brought to my attention on this
newsgroup... I think):

"Formal logical proofs, and therefore programs � formal logical proofs that particular
computations are possible, expressed in a formal system called a programming language �
are /utterly meaningless/. To write a computer program you have to come to terms with
this, to accept that whatever you might want the program to mean, the machine will blindly
follow its meaningless rules and come to some meaningless conclusion. In the test the
consistent group [good programmers] showed a pre-acceptance of this fact: they are capable
of seeing mathematical calculation problems in terms of rules, and can follow those rules
wheresoever they may lead. The inconsistent group [so-so programmers], on the other hand,
looks for meaning where it is not. The blank group [bad programmers] knows that it is
looking at meaninglessness, and refuses to deal with it."

From: www.cs.mdx.ac.uk/research/PhDArea/saeed/paper1.pdf

If one can program well in IDL, I reckon one's "utterly meaningless" detector must be
pretty well calibrated. :oD

cheers,

paulv

--
Paul van Delst Ride lots.
CIMSS @ NOAA/NCEP/EMC Eddy Merckx
Ph: (301)763-8000 x7748
Fax:(301)763-8545
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Color background with PLOT
Next Topic: Re: Image warping in IDL

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 19:34:28 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00200 seconds