comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Interesting Rant
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Interesting Rant [message #51383 is a reply to message #51314] Wed, 15 November 2006 12:13 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
gknoke is currently offline  gknoke
Messages: 9
Registered: September 2006
Junior Member
Correct me if I'm wrong, but it's my understanding that for loops in
IDL are so painfully slow because so much effort has been put into
making vector operations so mind-numbingly fast, and there's some
trade-off to be made there. I think the ranter has overlooked that
critical point. As someone who does a lot of image processing, I
rarely have occasion to operate on particular array elements anyway.
I'm still a relative newcomer to IDL, but my biggest gripe has (and
always will be) inefficient memory allocation... it's a pain when you
can't hold two large arrays (maybe 1/4 of available memory each) in
memory even though IDL has 2GB to play with. The rest is details and
idiosyncracies. Every language has its strengths and weaknesses, the
trick is to know what language is ideal for your task, or if you're
forced to use a particular language, learn to write code that exploits
the strengths of that language.
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: Bitmap vectorization
Next Topic: Color background with PLOT

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sat Oct 11 11:36:20 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 8.71979 seconds