| Re: nested structures in dlm [message #52183 is a reply to message #52175] |
Wed, 17 January 2007 06:20   |
lbusoni
Messages: 7
Registered: January 2007
|
Junior Member |
|
|
Karl,
thanks for the reply.
Sometimes it works fine for me too.
Could you please try again increasing n_of_objects in order to
maximize the probability of failure??
(with n_of_objects=250 I got a 10/10 of failures)
When it works fine, then it works fine forever in the current idl
session.
But if I stop and rerun IDL, the bad behaviuor can pop up again (sorry
to be so generic, but I can't find a completely deterministic behaviour
in this bug).
I tried to compile both with C and C++ compiler (on Linux). gcc is
4.1.2, idl is 6.2.
lbusoni$ gcc -Wall -shared -o tests.so wrapper_prova.cpp
-I/usr/local/rsi/idl/external/include -lstdc++
lbusoni$ gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: i486-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../src/configure -v
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++,treelang --prefix=/usr
--enable-shared --with-system-zlib --libexecdir=/usr/lib
--without-included-gettext --enable-threads=posix --enable-nls
--program-suffix=-4.1 --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-clocale=gnu
--enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-mpfr --enable-checking=release
i486-linux-gnu
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.1.2 20060928 (prerelease) (Ubuntu 4.1.1-13ubuntu5)
lbusoni$ idl
IDL Version 6.2 (linux x86 m32). (c) 2005, Research Systems, Inc.
Lorenzo
Karl Schultz wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 04:55:50 -0800, lbusoni wrote:
>
>> HI Guru's of DLMs,
>>
>
> snip
>
>> It seems that me and IDL_MakeStruct got confused
>> Any idea of what's happening? My code is completely crazy?
>> Thanks
>> Lorenzo
>
> I compiled your code and it seemed to work fine for me.
>
> ** Structure FOO, 5 tags, length=400, data length=400:
> V000 STRUCT -> V000 Array[1]
> V001 STRUCT -> V001 Array[1]
> V002 STRUCT -> V002 Array[1]
> V003 STRUCT -> V003 Array[1]
> V004 STRUCT -> V004 Array[1]
>
> I did this on Windows with the C compiler, not C++. So I had to rearrange
> some variable declarations, but nothing that would change anything. I
> also did not supply idl_free_cb to IDL_ImportArray just because I was
> lazy, but that should not be the problem either.
>
> So, I don't know what's wrong - it should work.
>
> Karl
|
|
|
|
comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Members
Search
Help
Login
Home
