comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: READS as a speed improvement or simply style?

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: READS as a speed improvement or simply style?

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: READS as a speed improvement or simply style? [message #52444 is a reply to message #52442]

Thu, 08 February 2007 13:29

news.qwest.net
Messages: 137
Registered: September 2005

Senior Member

"Brian Larsen" <balarsen@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1170969593.224830.24540@j27g2000cwj.googlegroups.com...
...
Elapsed time: 00:00:29 (29.851995 sec)
...
> Elapsed time: 00:00:08 (8.1684880 sec)
>
> Which is pretty amazing!!!

It may be due in a fair bit to the fact that method one
calls 10 functions each iteration, and method 2 calls 1.
There is some overhead involved in each function call.

Personally I don't see that much of a difference
I get the opposite result: (removing the unkown trim function)
Elapsed time: 5.2030001 Seconds.

Elapsed time: 7.0630000 Seconds.

Cheers,
bob

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: READS as a speed improvement or simply style? By: Brian Larsen on Thu, 08 February 2007 13:35
		Re: READS as a speed improvement or simply style? By: news.qwest.net on Thu, 08 February 2007 13:29

Previous Topic:	Re: What are the errors in the FFT?
Next Topic:	A function for use with psym

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 17:47:54 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00436 seconds